Back to overview

The calculation

Provisional

Why Elon Musk scores 22%

Based on his record of verifiable public statements and promises in this tracked dataset, Elon Musk is highly untrustworthy under the published rubric.

3,100points earned
13,800points possible across 138 claims
= 22.5%, rounded to 22%
01

This is a curated corpus of consequential, verifiable claims—not a random sample of everything Musk has said.

02

A missed, false, or unsupported claim does not by itself establish that the speaker intended to deceive.

03

17 Pending or Unresolved records stay public but do not affect the headline denominator.

Strict promise audit

19.3% of resolved promises and forecasts passed every material term.

Timing is part of the proposition. Later delivery is documented as context, but it does not restore points after an original deadline was missed.

Pass

Every material term was met.

16.5%16 / 97

Fail

At least one matured material term failed.

69.1%67 / 97

Pending

The stated deadline or condition has not matured.

12.4%12 / 97

Unresolved

The available evidence cannot establish pass or fail.

2.1%2 / 97

Intentional-deception review

Wrong is not automatically a lie.

Every record now answers whether intentional deception was established from its cited evidence. This is a separate, higher-threshold assessment and never mechanically changes the Trust Score.

Yes

The cited record meets the published standard for establishing knowing deception.

0.0%0 / 155

No

The evidence supports an outcome or accuracy judgment, but does not establish Musk’s state of mind.

89.0%138 / 155

Not assessable

Pending or unresolved evidence does not support a responsible intent assessment.

11.0%17 / 155
“No” does not mean the statement was true.

It means the available evidence did not establish intentional deception. The more detailed audit separately marks 5 records as “Suggested but not established.”

Supporting measures

What the single score contains.

Each denominator answers a different question. The labels stay scoped to this verified corpus.

Claims included in the Trust Score

Pending and Unresolved claims remain visible but do not alter the denominator.

89.0%138 / 155

Claims rated True or Mostly True

These categories earn at least 75% of the maximum 100-point weight in the current classification key.

14.2%22 / 155

Claims rated False

False earns zero points; the verdict does not by itself establish intent.

58.7%91 / 155

Contested by credible sources

Contestation is a separate evidence badge, not a score-bearing verdict.

36.8%57 / 155

Score by subject category

5 subject areas, disclosed separately.

Every record has a subject category, whether the claim concerns a company, public affairs, science, media, or Musk personally. Each result shows its own denominator; a category with no score-bearing records remains visible as not scored.

Personal & Legal40.6% · n=8 scored of 9
Media & Society31.7% · n=15 scored of 17
Business & Technology21.2% · n=79 scored of 92
Politics & Government18.1% · n=29 scored of 29
Science & Health14.3% · n=7 scored of 8
Organizations are context, not the taxonomy.

When an organization or other entity is relevant, it remains available as an independent filter in the evidence index. Public-discourse topics are also tracked separately where they apply.

All 155 records

Canonical verdict distribution.

Promises and forecasts use strict pass/fail categories when resolved; factual assertions retain the nuanced categories shown here. All 7 canonical outcomes come from the current classification key.

True
19
Mostly True
3
Misleading
14
Unsupported
11
False
91
Pending
12
Unresolved
5

Challenge the weights

Recalculate the score yourself.

The published verdicts stay fixed. Change how much credit each score tier receives and see the result immediately.

Your weighting22.5%
Published score22.5%

The complete evidence index

The record, claim by claim.

Search all 155 records. Open any claim to inspect its original source, measured outcome, scoring contribution, confidence, contestation status, and intent status.

Showing 155 of 155 claims

  1. PUBLIC-038Jun 12, 2002Personal & LegalPersonal & BiographicalPublic discourseFactual Assertion

    A PayPal SEC filing represented Musk as receiving a B.S. in Physics and a B.S. in Economics from the University of Pennsylvania in 1995.

    The underlying education was real, but University of Pennsylvania alumni material identifies Musk as W’97 and C’97 and describes a B.S. in economics and B.A. in physics. The filing misstated both the physics degree type and the award year.

    Misleading50%
    Open evidence record
  2. PAYPAL-001Aug 9, 2018Business & TechnologyPayPalFactual Assertion

    Said he founded PayPal and X.com.

    Musk founded X.com, which merged with Confinity. SEC filings state that Confinity developed the original PayPal product; the merged X.com entity later changed its name to PayPal. Musk was central to the corporate lineage but did not independently found the original PayPal product.

    Misleading50%
    Open evidence record
  3. PUBLIC-011Sep 5, 2018Personal & LegalAccusations About IndividualsPublic discourseFactual Assertion

    Accused cave rescuer Vernon Unsworth of being a child rapist and of moving to Thailand for a child bride.

    Musk supplied no substantiating evidence. A later jury rejected Unsworth’s defamation claim under the applicable legal standard, but that verdict did not establish the criminal accusation as true; Musk testified that his earlier phrase was not meant literally.

    Unsupported25%
    Open evidence record
  4. PUBLIC-030Nov 21, 2022Personal & LegalPersonal & BiographicalPublic discourseFactual Assertion

    Said his firstborn child died in his arms and that he felt the child’s last heartbeat.

    Justine Musk publicly disputed the account, saying she was the person holding the child when he died and that emergency responders had resuscitated him before life support was withdrawn. Public evidence reviewed here does not independently resolve the precise circumstances.

    Credibly ContestedExcluded
    Open evidence record
  5. PUBLIC-012May 6, 2023Personal & LegalPersonal & BiographicalPublic discourseFactual Assertion

    Said his father did not own an emerald mine.

    Walter Isaacson’s reporting supports the narrow ownership denial: Errol Musk did not own a formal mine, although he acquired a share of emerald output from informal operations.

    True100%
    Open evidence record
  6. OPENAI-002Feb 29, 2024Business & TechnologyOpenAIFactual Assertion

    Alleged that OpenAI’s founding agreement required its code and technology to remain open to the public rather than be closed for private gain.

    OpenAI began with an open-collaboration mission, but released emails show Musk agreed that “open” did not necessarily require publishing all AGI science or code. The asserted permanent, comprehensive open-source requirement overstates the documented agreement.

    Misleading50%
    Open evidence record
  7. OPENAI-004Feb 29, 2024Business & TechnologyOpenAIFactual Assertion

    Alleged that OpenAI’s leaders secretly betrayed a binding agreement to remain nonprofit and never pursue a for-profit structure.

    Released emails show Musk himself supported creating a for-profit entity, sought majority equity and control, and proposed merging OpenAI into Tesla. That conflicts with the broad claim that he had secured and consistently defended a permanent no-for-profit agreement.

    Misleading50%
    Open evidence record
  8. PUBLIC-042Sep 9, 2024Politics & GovernmentImmigration & DemographicsPublic discourseFactual Assertion

    Amplified and affirmatively adopted the claim that Haitian immigrants in Springfield were harming or eating residents’ pets, using it as a reason to vote against Kamala Harris.

    Springfield police and officials said there were no credible reports of Haitian immigrants stealing or eating pets; supporting images and incidents circulated online were unrelated or misrepresented.

    False0%
    Open evidence record
  9. ZIP2-001Oct 27, 2024Personal & LegalPersonal & BiographicalZip2Factual Assertion

    Denied that he worked illegally while launching Zip2, saying he was in fact allowed to work in the United States.

    Washington Post reporting based on company records, former associates, court materials, immigration experts, and a 2005 Musk email found that Musk lacked work authorization during at least part of Zip2’s early period. An investment agreement required the Musk brothers to obtain legal work status within 45 days, and Musk later wrote that he had no legal right to stay in the country at one point.

    False0%
    Open evidence record
  10. PUBLIC-034Jan 6, 2025Politics & GovernmentAccusations About IndividualsPublic discourseFactual Assertion

    Accused UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer of being complicit in the sexual abuse scandal involving grooming gangs.

    Reuters reported that, as director of public prosecutions, Starmer brought the first major grooming-gang prosecution, reopened cases, and oversaw changes intended to improve prosecutions. The evidence does not substantiate the accusation that he was complicit in abuse.

    Unsupported25%
    Open evidence record
  11. TESLA-051Jul 26, 2026Personal & LegalPersonal & BiographicalTeslaFactual Assertion

    Tesla’s official biography says Musk co-founded Tesla.

    Tesla was incorporated in 2003 by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning. Musk joined as lead investor and board chair in 2004. A 2009 legal settlement recognized five people, including Musk, as co-founders, so the title is valid but incomplete without the chronology.

    Mostly True75%
    Open evidence record

Audit the rules too

See how every verdict and exclusion works.

Read the methodology