Back to evidence index
PAYPAL-003Undated profileBusiness & TechnologyPayPalFactual Assertion

Was described as PayPal’s largest shareholder until eBay acquired the company.

True100%Medium confidence

Evidence chain

From statement to verdict.

  1. 01

    Original statement

    Was described as PayPal’s largest shareholder until eBay acquired the company.

    Undated profile · Factual Assertion

  2. 02

    Measurable target

    Present-tense or retrospective claim

    Not applicable

  3. 03

    Observed outcome

    PayPal’s 2001 Form 10-K listed Musk with 7,109,989 shares, or 11.7%, the largest disclosed individual holding in the table before the eBay acquisition.

    Evaluated Jul 26, 2026

  4. 04

    Verdict and score

    True

    100 of 100 points under the v5 rubric. Promise/forecast verdict: Every material term was met, including timing, scope, quantity, capability, price, and permanence. Factual verdict: The central factual proposition is supported by strong evidence.

Record details

How this row was evaluated.

Subject category
Business & Technology
Organization or context
PayPal
Relationship to organization
Former affiliation
Assertion mode
Authorized or biographical profile representation
Deadline result
Not applicable
Eventual outcome
Not applicable
Factual accuracy
True
Canonical classification
True
Score points
100 / 100
Included in headline score
Yes
Research confidence
Medium
Credible-source contestation
No
Correction status
No public correction identified
Deleted after challenge
No
Repeated after correction
No
Evidence-documented repetition count
1

Intent stays separate

Was intentional deception established?

No

Detailed assessment
Not established
Intent evidence level
0 / 3

The cited evidence supports the claim or fulfillment. No evidence in this row establishes intentional deception.

“No” does not mean the statement was true. It means the cited evidence did not meet the higher standard needed to establish the speaker's state of mind.

Why this distinction matters

Evidence strength

A disclosed measure of evidence quality—not a probability.

Component scores measure source quality, corroboration, and directness. Verdict confidence begins with that evidence strength and applies the deductions documented in the methodology.

Evidence strength73of 100
Verdict confidence73Medium
Statement evidence quality18 / 30

Quality and directness of evidence that Musk made the statement.

Outcome evidence quality40 / 40

Quality of evidence establishing the outcome.

Corroboration0 / 15

Independent corroboration across sources and domains.

Directness15 / 15

How directly the evidence resolves the proposition.

Evidence sources
2
Independent source domains
2
Claim audit
Complete
Source audit
Pass

Source fields and evidence metrics populated.

Citations

Read the underlying sources.

Field-level evaluation audit

Every calculated output carries its own evidence basis.

Open any of the 12 audited outputs to see its calculated value, written basis, rule, and cited sources.

01Deadline resultNot applicable

Evidence basis

Compared the original target/timeframe (“Present-tense or retrospective claim”) with the documented outcome. Result: Not applicable. Evidence: Elon Musk Profile Page; PayPal 2001 Form 10-K. URLs: https://www.xprize.org/people/elon-musk; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1103415/000091205702009834/a2073071z10-k405.htm

Calculation rule

Compare original target with documented timing.

Evidence strength
73 / 100
Verdict confidence
73 / 100 · Medium
Audit status
Complete
02Eventual outcomeNot applicable

Evidence basis

Classified the later real-world result independently from the headline verdict. Result: Not applicable. Documented outcome: PayPal’s 2001 Form 10-K listed Musk with 7,109,989 shares, or 11.7%, the largest disclosed individual holding in the table before the eBay acquisition. Evidence: Elon Musk Profile Page; PayPal 2001 Form 10-K. URLs: https://www.xprize.org/people/elon-musk; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1103415/000091205702009834/a2073071z10-k405.htm

Calculation rule

Classify the later real-world outcome separately from the headline verdict.

Evidence strength
73 / 100
Verdict confidence
73 / 100 · Medium
Audit status
Complete
03Factual accuracyTrue

Evidence basis

Compared the normalized proposition with the cited records. Result: True. Documented outcome: PayPal’s 2001 Form 10-K listed Musk with 7,109,989 shares, or 11.7%, the largest disclosed individual holding in the table before the eBay acquisition. Evidence: Elon Musk Profile Page; PayPal 2001 Form 10-K. URLs: https://www.xprize.org/people/elon-musk; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1103415/000091205702009834/a2073071z10-k405.htm

Calculation rule

Compare the normalized factual proposition with cited evidence.

Evidence strength
73 / 100
Verdict confidence
73 / 100 · Medium
Audit status
Complete
04Canonical verdictTrue

Evidence basis

Factual-claim rule: apply the published True, Mostly True, Misleading, Unsupported, False, or Unresolved definition. Applied result: True (True). Evidence finding: PayPal’s 2001 Form 10-K listed Musk with 7,109,989 shares, or 11.7%, the largest disclosed individual holding in the table before the eBay acquisition. Evidence: Elon Musk Profile Page; PayPal 2001 Form 10-K. URLs: https://www.xprize.org/people/elon-musk; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1103415/000091205702009834/a2073071z10-k405.htm

Calculation rule

Apply strict promise rule or published factual-claim classification.

Evidence strength
73 / 100
Verdict confidence
73 / 100 · Medium
Audit status
Complete
05Score points100

Evidence basis

Score assigned mechanically from verdict and claim type under strict-promise-v1.0: True = 100 points.

Calculation rule

Map verdict mechanically to points under the applicable rule.

Evidence strength
73 / 100
Verdict confidence
73 / 100 · Medium
Audit status
Complete
06Inclusion in the Trust ScoreYes

Evidence basis

Included because the claim has a resolved evidence-based verdict.

Calculation rule

Include only resolved evidence-based verdicts.

Evidence strength
73 / 100
Verdict confidence
73 / 100 · Medium
Audit status
Complete
07Research confidenceMedium

Evidence basis

Evidence strength 73/100 = statement 18/30 + outcome 40/40 + corroboration 0/15 + directness 15/15. Published deductions yield verdict confidence 73/100 (Medium).

Calculation rule

Calculate from evidence components and published deductions.

Evidence strength
73 / 100
Verdict confidence
73 / 100 · Medium
Audit status
Complete
08Credible-source contestationNo

Evidence basis

Credible-source contestation: No. Resolution: No material contestation identified in the cited evidence. Evidence URLs: https://www.xprize.org/people/elon-musk; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1103415/000091205702009834/a2073071z10-k405.htm

Calculation rule

Record material credible-source disagreement separately from verdict.

Evidence strength
73 / 100
Verdict confidence
73 / 100 · Medium
Audit status
Complete
09Correction statusNo public correction identified

Evidence basis

Correction status is bounded to the cited record: No public correction identified. Evidence URLs: https://www.xprize.org/people/elon-musk; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1103415/000091205702009834/a2073071z10-k405.htm

Calculation rule

Bound correction finding to cited evidence.

Evidence strength
73 / 100
Verdict confidence
73 / 100 · Medium
Audit status
Complete
10Repetition after correctionNo

Evidence basis

Repeated after correction: No. Minimum documented repetition count: 1. Evidence URLs: https://www.xprize.org/people/elon-musk; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1103415/000091205702009834/a2073071z10-k405.htm

Calculation rule

Bound repetition finding to cited evidence.

Evidence strength
73 / 100
Verdict confidence
73 / 100 · Medium
Audit status
Complete
11Intentional-deception answerNo

Evidence basis

The cited evidence supports the claim or fulfillment. No evidence in this row establishes intentional deception.

Calculation rule

Require direct admission, adjudicated intent finding, or comparably conclusive state-of-mind evidence.

Evidence strength
73 / 100
Verdict confidence
73 / 100 · Medium
Audit status
Complete
12Strict promise resultNot applicable

Evidence basis

Factual-claim rule: apply the published True, Mostly True, Misleading, Unsupported, False, or Unresolved definition. Applied result: True (True). Evidence finding: PayPal’s 2001 Form 10-K listed Musk with 7,109,989 shares, or 11.7%, the largest disclosed individual holding in the table before the eBay acquisition. Evidence: Elon Musk Profile Page; PayPal 2001 Form 10-K. URLs: https://www.xprize.org/people/elon-musk; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1103415/000091205702009834/a2073071z10-k405.htm

Calculation rule

Pass only if every material promise or forecast term was met; otherwise Fail, Pending, Unresolved, or Not applicable.

Evidence strength
73 / 100
Verdict confidence
73 / 100 · Medium
Audit status
Complete

Audit trail

Selection and scoring notes.

v5 classification rationale
Factual-claim rule: apply the published True, Mostly True, Misleading, Unsupported, False, or Unresolved definition. Applied result: True (True). Evidence finding: PayPal’s 2001 Form 10-K listed Musk with 7,109,989 shares, or 11.7%, the largest disclosed individual holding in the table before the eBay acquisition. Evidence: Elon Musk Profile Page; PayPal 2001 Form 10-K. URLs: https://www.xprize.org/people/elon-musk; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1103415/000091205702009834/a2073071z10-k405.htm
v4 → v5 source-package migration audit
Audited, no headline change. Evidence and derived statistics re-audited.
Selection basis
Material v3 expansion claim selected under published inclusion rules
Source quality
Profile statement verified against contemporaneous SEC ownership disclosure; profile publication date is not shown V4 evidence metrics: statement 18/30; outcome 40/40; corroboration 0/15; directness 15/15.
Methodology note
V5 uses strict-promise-v1.0. Later delivery does not earn partial credit for a missed dated promise. Scored under the v3 True category at 100 points. This rating measures demonstrated reliability and does not by itself establish deceptive intent.